* Funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
Latest News: MORECare e-learning is currently being developped
Despite being a core business of medicine, end of life care (EoLC) is neglected. It is hampered by research that is difficult to conduct with no common standards. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidance on the best methods for the design and conduct of research on EoLC to further knowledge in the field.
MORECare built on the Medical Research Council guidance on the development and evaluation of complex interventions. We conducted systematic literature reviews, transparent expert consultations (TEC) involving consensus methods of nominal group and online voting, and stakeholder workshops to identify challenges and best practice in EoLC research, including: participation recruitment, ethics, attrition, integration of mixed methods, complex outcomes and economic evaluation.
We synthesised all findings to develop a guidance statement – the MORECare statement on the best methods to research EoLC. The statement provides a first step in setting common, much needed standards for evaluative research in EoLC and may be used alongside existing statements for reporting studies. The statement is relevant to those undertaking research, trainee researchers, research funders, ethical committees and editors.
The statement provides 36 best practice solutions for research evaluating services and treatments in EoLC to improve study quality and set the standard for future research. Key recommendations: Show/Hide
1. It is ethically desirable for patients and families in EoLC to be offered involvement in research
2. High rates of attrition should be assumed. A study with limited attrition due to death or worsening illness may justifiably be criticised for recruiting the wrong patients
3. Use the MORECARE classification of attrition to describe causes of attrition: that is,
• ADD – attrition due to death;
• ADI - attrition due to illness;
• AaR - attrition at random
4. The properties of the best outcome measure be responsive to change over time and capture clinically important data
5. Seek to amend the law in England regarding consent so that advance consent for studies other than clinical trials of medicinal products is legally effective.
MRC guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions (NIHR School for Social Care Research Methods Review): Application to research on palliative and end of life care. [Link to full Review] [Reference]
bTransparent Expert Consultations
MORECare Elearning: MORECare Elearning is currently being developed and will be piloted during the autumn 2014. We anticipate six modules covering the following areas1) introduction to complex interventions and MRC framework ; 2) Selection of outcome measures; 3) Use of outcome measure; 4) Missing Data, attrition and response shift in palliative care; 5) Mixed methods; 6) Ethics. For more information or questions, please contact Hamid Benalia
We would like to thank the workshop participants for their time and contributions to developing the guidance statement Show/Hide names
Health Economics Workshop: Karen Gerard, Rachel Baker, Joanna Coast, Will Hollingworth, Paul Mccrone, Steve Dewar, Sandy Tubeuf, Alan Haycox, Barbara Hanratty, Hareth Al-Janabi, Rosa Orlando, Claire Hulme, Hristina Petkova, Eugene Murray, Rachel Houten, Aki Tsuchiya, Barb Daveson, Barbara Gomes, Iris Groeneveld, Yvonne Kaloki
Research Partner Workshop: Kuzna Jackson, Christine Coates, Jan Loudon, Pauline Turnbull, Mrs Stannard, Joan Robertson, Len Leeder, Beryl Wade, Jane Wells, Janet Hall, Irene McGill, Daisy Lussier, Bert Green, M.J. Kyffin, Gail Capstick, David Pedder, Jill Robinson
Outcome measurement Workshop:Amy Abernethy, Claudia Bausewein, Mike Bennett, Eduardo Bruera, Augusto Caraceni, Nathan Cherny, Vito Curiale, David Currow , Barb Daveson, Luc Deliens, Anneke L Francke, Richard Harding, Stein Kaasa, Joan Marston, Geoff Mitchell, Josep Porta-Sales, Florian Strasser
Statistics Workshop: Peter Fayers, Irene McGill, Matther Hotopf, Mike Campbell, Mark Piling, Julia Brown, Yuen King Ho, Christina Ramsenthaler, Stephen Walters, Ivonne Solis-Trapala, Mike Bradburn, Claudia Bausewein, Andrew Pickles Stakeholder Consulation : Susan Heatley, Julie Bills, Dai Roberts, Kay Greene, Lesley Dunleavy, Adam Firth, Christina Ireland, Bev Melia, Wendy Johnson, Sarah Lake, Josie Candlin, Maurice Philips
Mixed Methods Workshop: Domhnall MacAuley, Bridget Candy, Joy Adamson, Kate Flemming, Suzanne Moffatt, Julia Brannen, Marilyn Kendall, Jonathan Koffman, Louise Jones, Bill Noble, Rona Campbell, Gail Ewing, Katherine Froggatt, Nick Mays, Eleni Epiphaniou, Sue Hall, Despina Anagnostou, Marion McAllister, Anne Rogers, Simon Lewin
The Methods Of Researching End of Life Care (MORECare) is a collaboration between: Show/Hide
MORECare was funded by the NIHR and managed by the MRC as part of the Methodology Research Programme (MRP) (number: G0802654/1). MORECare aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise ‘best practice’ methods to develop and evaluate palliative and EoLC, particularly focusing on complex service-delivery interventions and reconfigurations. Principal investigator: Irene J Higginson. Co-principal investigator: Chris Todd. The members of MORECare are: Co-investigators - Peter Fayers, Gunn Grande, Richard Harding, Matthew Hotopf, Penney Lewis, Paul McCrone, Scott Murray, Myfanwy Morgan; Project advisory group - Massimo Costantini, Steve Dewar, John Ellershaw, Claire Henry, William Hollingworth, Philip Hurst, Tessa Ing, Karl Lorenz, Rajan Madhok, Jane Maher, Irene McGill, Elizabeth Murray, Ann Netten, Alicia O'Cathain, Sheila Payne, Roland Petchey, Wendy Prentice, Deborah Tanner and Celia A Taylor; Researchers - Hamid Benalia, Catherine J Evans, Marjolein Gysels, Nancy J Preston and Vicky Short. Morag Farquhar was supported by a Macmillan Cancer Support Post-Doctoral Fellowship. Irene J Higginson is an NIHR Senior Investigator.